Today is the first in a series of guest post coming up here at Well Read and I'm delighted that my first guest is the lovely and charming Josephine Myles. Jo has a new book out at Samhain at the moment, which you can find out all about, as well as have a chance to win a copy, at the bottom of this post. So without further ado, I'll hand over to Jo.
Deliciously flawed characters and why I love them
I've said in the past that I write character-driven romance, and have been asked to explain what I mean by that on a couple of occasions. To my mind, this means that the plot of the story revolves around the emotional development of the heroes, and in order for them to develop they need some character flaws - preferably some big, juicy ones. I'm not talking about minor irritants like not picking up after themselves or being forgetful - no, I need something meaty to sink my teeth into and generate plenty of conflict to keep the story going.
So what does make a good flaw? I honestly don't think I could handle anything too repellent, so I'm not about to write a romance about a murderer, rapist or anyone who deliberately sets out to cause harm to others. What I'm after is something that could be an asset if channelled correctly. For instance, in Barging In, Dan's flaw is his promiscuity (as far as Robin is concerned, anyway). However, this springs from two things: a deep-seated fear of commitment which he needs to deal with in order to move on; and an uncomplicated love of sex. With the right partner, situation and a certain amount of character growth on Dan's part, his libidinous tendencies could be channelled in a way that doesn't destroy his relationship.
Of course, to give us the necessary conflict in a novel length romance, the flawed hero needs to be paired up with someone whose own faults clash with them. Dan is pitted against Robin, a man who has not been able to move on from a past hurt and has let it sour his whole outlook on love. Robin finds it very difficult to trust other men, but is also intensely loyal to those few he does let into his heart. Free and easy Dan represents everything Robin is suspicious of, but also everything he needs to make peace with in order to move on with his life. Conversely, Dan needs someone as uncompromising as Robin in order to find the motivation to earn his trust.
There is a danger in writing deeply flawed characters, however. It's vitally important to give them good qualities too - not just at the superficial level of appearance, but to show that they have a sense of humour and exhibit kindness towards others - even if that's only to some people some of the time. Of course, good looks never hurt a romantic hero, but being fundamentally good somewhere on the inside is even more important. It can be hidden under the grumpiest veneer, but it needs to be lurking there in order for the character to be lovable. Being aware of and struggling against their own faults is also a real plus point. I seem to be able to tolerate a large amount of bad behaviour, provided I know the character is at least trying to change.
I know some readers want their heroes less complicated and are easily put off by what they define as "immoral" behaviour: cheating, lying, promiscuity and drug use being prime examples of non-heroic behaviour. However, if a writer has created a compelling character who lies through his teeth, yet takes the time to explain why he acts that way, I'm likely to love that character precisely because of his flaws. I love watching a character change for the better through the course of the novel, as the events make them question their outlook on life and find new ways of seeing the world. So long as light wins out in the end, I can take a fair bit of shadow on the journey there.
Who wants to read about the perfect hero? Not me, that's for sure. I find perfection dull and prefer my heroes deliciously flawed. How about you? What character faults can you tolerate in a romantic hero? And do you have any favourite deliciously flawed heroes to share with us?
***
Barging In blurb:
When the boat’s a rockin’, don’t come knockin’!
Out-and-proud travel writer Dan Taylor can’t steer a boat to save his life, but that doesn’t stop him from accepting an assignment to write up a narrowboat holiday. Instead of a change of pace from city life, though, the canal seems dull as ditchwater. Until he crashes into the boat of a half-naked, tattooed, pierced man whose rugged, penniless appearance is at odds with a posh accent.
Still smarting from past betrayal, Robin Hamilton’s “closet” is his narrowboat, his refuge from outrageous, provocative men like Dan. Yet he can’t seem to stop himself from rescuing the hopelessly out-of-place city boy from one scrape after another. Until he finds himself giving in to reluctant attraction, even considering a brief, harmless fling.
After all, in less than a week, Dan’s going back to his London diet of casual hook-ups and friends with benefits.
Determined not to fall in love, both men dive into one week of indulgence…only to find themselves drawn deep into an undertow of escalating intimacy and emotional intensity. Troubled waters neither of them expected…or wanted.
Product Warnings:
Contains one lovable tart, one posh boy gone feral, rough sex, alfresco sex, vile strawberry flavoured condoms, intimate body piercings, red thermal long-johns, erotic woodchopping, an errant cat, a few colourful characters you wouldn’t touch with a bargepole, and plenty of messing about on the river.
Available now from Amazon and Samhain.
Author bio:
English through and through, Josephine Myles is addicted to tea and busy cultivating a reputation for eccentricity. She writes gay erotica and romance, but finds the erotica keeps cuddling up to the romance, and the romance keeps corrupting the erotica. She blames her rebellious muse but he never listens to her anyway, no matter how much she threatens him with a big stick. She’s beginning to suspect he enjoys it.
Visit Jo's website for more about her published work, saucy free reads and regular blog posts.
COMMENT TO WIN: All comments during the Barging In blog tour will be entered into a prize draw for a 10″x7″ signed and mounted print of Jo's photograph of the Kennet and Avon canal, near Bath – as used on the cover of Barging In! What’s more, the stretch of canal shown here is the location where Dan first crashes into Robin.
The more comments you leave, the more chances to win. Please remember to leave your email address in the body of the comment so Jo can get in touch with you. She’ll make the draw on 2nd October, 9pm GMT, so you have until then to leave your comments
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)








I always prefer a flawed hero to a perfect one - and I think you've hit on the key points for making a flawed hero likeable: explain why he's flawed, and have him aware of his faults, and trying to change them (just saying - I could have done with reading this before I did the first draft of Midnight in Berlin! *g*)
ReplyDeleteThere's an interesting post on this subject over on Fantasy Faction, btw - different genre; same concerns!
I go for flawed every time!
ReplyDeleteMr Darcy was my first flawed hero and I so loved his arrogant, superior first proposal to Lizzie Bennett...and her dismissal of him. Heh!
Both Dan and Robin are 'real' people for me. They are flawed and I can understand - in part - why they are. One of the things I really like about 'Barging In' is the hint of something in Robin's past and the trickle of information about this leading to more mystery. That had me biting my nails wondering...
@ Jamie - I think Leon ended up as loveably flawed by the final draft! And that's a great article you've linked, btw. I suspect we need our assurance of a happy ending in romance, but other than that I think everything else applies! (although all my heroes have penises...)
ReplyDelete@ Prue - oh yes, Mr Darcy! He's a fantastic flawed hero, although I would go one further and vote for Heathcliff ;)
I'm so glad you're enjoying Dan and Robin's flaws. They certainly have a fair few between them.
"so I'm not about to write a romance about a murderer, rapist or anyone who deliberately sets out to cause harm to others." Whew. *wipes brow with relief* ;-) I'm not too big of a fan of the asshole as a hero. I have to like SOMETHING about them as you said, even if it's only that they have a soft spot for kittens in trees.
ReplyDeleteI think sometimes the heroes of m/m are a bit idealized. I would like to see more drug using heroes. That sounds so stupid because I am totally anti-drug and have never even tried them myself (I've a phobia about breathing anything in but air), but I think casual drug use, especially among young people is pretty common. I'm not looking for addicts and meth-heads, but when out at a club someone takes some extasy. It happens and it doesn't mean they are not a good person or are on the road to ruin, but we never seem to see heroes who are less than pure on some fronts. Even showing underaged drinking is kind of a *gasp* moment for some people. (Although depends on where your setting is what underage is.)
I think while on some level as romance readers we want the knight in shining armor, on the other hand I don't want someone so perfect that I can't envision them as real people or they are so perfect I'd be afraid to even be their friend because I'd never be good enough.
My main character flaw is writing long-winded comments. :-D
I know just what you mean about the drinking and drug-taking, Tam. It's really not that big a deal and most youngsters go through a phase of experimenting without doing themselves any harm. My editor did have to check with Samhain management that it was okay for Robin to smoke a joint, though. Come on, he's a boater! Smoking pot is practically mandatory when you're a boater ;)
ReplyDeleteIt's a bit of that North American weirdness where he could rip someone's head off and there could be graphic explanations of blood spurting and bones breaking, but he can't smoke a joint. LOL
ReplyDeleteI just recently read an overheard conversation about some mother who was concerned a video game had sex in it and the clerk said no but it was EXTREMELY violent, rated for adults, and she said she was getting it for her 8 year old and wanted to make sure there was no kissing or nudity. But watching people's heads explode was okay. *shakes head* I'd rather give my kid a porn video. LOL
meh! Heathcliffe is a flaw too far :D
ReplyDeleteBecause you'd mentioned liking Wuthering Heights somewhere, I started listening to a serialisation of it on Radio 4 extra.
Aaaargghhhhh!!!! No!!!! I couldn't take it.
Flawed people make so much more interesting reads. Too shiny equals too fluffy equals boring. In most cases that is imo.
ReplyDeleteI'm starting to think that there are two types of m/m readers: one that likes their heroes pure and perfect, and the other who prefer them a little more colorful. I'm in the second crowd.
ReplyDeleteAll Dan's and Robin's character flaws make sense both from the POV of their backgrounds and excellently so from the POV of the plot. Watching them slowly come to terms with each other is a joy in the book. It worked really well.
ReplyDeleteI've seen stories where it seems as though the author has suddenly thought "oops, he's a bit too perfect. I'd better give him some kind of flaw" and the flaw is obviously a bolted on afterthought that's of no real importance to the story. I've also seen stories where the heros are so damaged that they are actually extremely unlikable and reading about them is uncomfortable and disturbing, even though the eventual development and redemption is well written. I guess I prefer a happy medium.
@ Tam - yeah, I don't get the fact that graphic violence is okay by many people's standards, but graphic sex and drug use is a complete no-no. Seeing as how the sex and drugs don't (usually) hurt anyone, it just seems like the most bizarre standards to uphold. And people who have a problem with nudity? They're crackers! We are all naked underneath our clothing ;D
ReplyDelete@ Prue - don't you go dissing Heathcliff, you hear me? I love him! ;P
@ Ingrid - I wholeheartedly agree. I've read a fair few fluffy characters and I find it very difficult to remember them now. They all blur into a bland, homogenised "boy next door" figure - a bit like the guys they find to sing in those godawful boy bands!
@ Lou - I reckon you're right. There are certainly some who the moment you suggest a character might even be tempted to cheat (not that they do it, just that they're tempted), lose all affection for that character. It's good that there are plenty of fluffy romances with nice guys out there for them, though. Like you say, different strokes for different folks...
ReplyDelete@ Elin - thank you - to me Barging In was all about Robin and Dan growing to a place where they could have a relationship together. Both of them have a lot of maturing to do and they're not ready at the start, but I wanted to follow them on that journey.
And yes - extremes can be difficult to read, can't they? Mr Perfect who has an annoying tendency to be late for everything is still Mr Perfect, IMO! Give me something a bit meatier than that - although stop short of the complete antihero too :)
Hi Jo
ReplyDeleteThanks for visiting my humble blog with such an interesting and thought provoking post. I must admit, I love a flawed hero, even the ones that you would think are beyond redemption. In the hands of a good author (such as yourself) there is a delight for me in seeing a man changed, especially by love.
One thing I must insist on though, if the hero's flaws have brought hurt (either intentionally or unintentionally) to the other hero, there needs to be sufficient grovelling before I'm happy with the HEA/HFN :).
@ Jen - Thank you for having me! You were a star to step in and help out when my previous host double booked.
ReplyDeleteOoh yes, grovelling - how could I forget! Very important to get an apology, of course. And one that sounds like they mean it - preferably on their knees ;)
The bit that struck me most is where you say: "What I'm after is something that could be an asset if channelled correctly."
ReplyDeleteThat's definitely the way I like to think of it. In fact when working on my characters I don't tend to think in terms of flaws and strengths, but traits and tendencies that have both positive and negative sides. Like someone who's single-minded can be very focused, but also blinkered. Someone with strict principles for their own behaviour could be rigid and unforgiving of others who don't live up to the same standards. An optimistic person might not let themselves be depressed by setbacks, but might not pay enough attention to a problem they should sort out now, things like that.
I like doing it that way, it keeps the characterisation consistent, I think.
@ Becky - Very well put - those are all great examples of the continuum of virtues/flaws. For instance, I know that I'm stubborn to a fault which drives people up the wall, yet the flipside of that is that I'm extremely determined and if I set myself a challenge I will see it through :)
ReplyDelete*imagine you're rereading Tam's first paragraph*
ReplyDelete:)
Flawed is so much more interesting, because perfection is annoying. :)
I think a flawed character is much more interesting and more realistic. Perfect characters often bore me, that being said they have to be redeemable or movable in some way.
ReplyDeleteI think my all time best flawed chararera is Tor from bareback. He cheats yet your still routing for him
Sarahs7836(at)gmail(dot)com
@ Chris - do I sound like I'm trying to convince myself I won't write a really bad hero? My muse can be capricious at times. He comes up with some ideas I really, REALLY don't want to write!
ReplyDelete@ Sarah - I really loved Tor as well. I think Jake was such an inflexible, stubborn idiot that I couldn't help rooting for Tor, even though he had cheated. It seemed understandable, given the circumstances.
I love a flawed hero and I think that's one of the main reasons that books are memorable. The characters aren't perfect (god that's the fastest way to lose me in a book).
ReplyDeleteI also like subtly flawed heros. I mean the great obvious flaws (cheating) can make for some intense angst but I also appreciate the more subtle flaws/quirks that make someone more human and real. Everyone has something about them that isn't great. I can appreciate a hero that is scared or not the most honest EVERY single time.
I think the heros in Barging In really resonated because they felt honest and real. They didn't need to be perfect because they fit together.
Thanks Kassa - that's great to know you thought Robin and Dan "fit together" :D
ReplyDeleteI agree about characters who are scared and/or dishonest. I know some readers claim lying characters are a real turn-off for them, but I think it's fascinating to see the reasons why people might be economical with the truth.
Or maybe I'm just fascinated by liars because I've always been so rubbish at lying...