Thursday, 6 October 2011

Confession Time

Sometimes you know, I think there might be something wrong with me as a reader of m/m romance.  You see, there are a few m/m books or series out there which are universally LOVED by other readers.  Everyone likes them and they nearly always get four or five star reviews, mainly because of the pairing of the characters.  Yet....they do nothing for me.  Let me give you a couple of examples, and I fully expect you all to be completely aghast and refuse to read this blog again because I'm indifferent to these characters.

Ty and Zane from Cut and Run by Madeleine Urban and Abigail Roux
There's a whole fan page devoted to these guys on Good Reads and every time there's a new book out in the Cut and Run series, there's a whole load of squeeing goes on over the m/m blogs/Good Reads/Twitter.  I read Cut and Run and thought it was a good book, not as good as Cool Runnings by these authors, but a decent read none-the-less. I wasn't so in love with the characters that I felt I wanted to read any more books with them in, so I haven't read the next two books in the series.  I'm in the complete minority, it seems, because everyone else is madly in love with Ty and Zane.


Taylor and Will from Dangerous Ground by Josh Lanyon
I really liked Dangerous Ground and have even re-read it a couple of times.  However, I read it for the story which is a thrilling action/adventure plot, rather than the characters of Taylor and Will.  I read the second book and the plot started taking a bit of a back seat to their relationship troubles and I haven't bothered to read any of the others - although I have book 3 on my TBR pile.  Again, I am in the minority here because most m/m readers love Taylor and Will and get very excited about a new release in the series.


Now I'm not trying to say that there's anything wrong with loving these characters. There isn't. It's got nothing to do with the authors either because I have books by all of the authors in my 'comfort read' pile and they are all auto-buys (except for these particular series's).  There's also nothing wrong with the books or series in question. As far as I can tell they are well written with exciting plots and have a large number of very positive reviews. No, the fault is entirely with me and I feel like I'm missing something somehow in not loving these characters like everyone else does.

Another baffling thing is that if you were to ask me what it was about these characters or this pairing that means I don't connect to them, I wouldn't be able to answer.  Taken individually, these guys are well rounded, interesting characters and I can see why some readers would find them fascinating and want more from them.  But not me. I find it rather frustrating.  I want to join in with the general excitement of a new release with these characters. Instead I find myself on the sidelines, watching everyone and wondering what all the fuss is about.  It's a lonely place to be.

It's one of those strange times when, for whatever reason, I feel like I'm swimming a little against the tide.  It's not a comfortable feeling and makes me think I'm turning into a grumpy middle-aged woman!  It also shows that all readers are different and what one reader finds fascinating and marvellous, another reader will only think is OK.  So, I'll sit on my sidelines and wave my (possibly rainbow coloured) flag for all you readers who love these characters and wish I could be as excited as you are.

So, confession time: Are there any really popular books/characters/series which you can't connect with, which leave you standing on the sidelines wondering why everyone is so excited?  Come on, I can't be the only one, surely?!

36 comments:

  1. I confess! The Merry Gentry books. I love the Anita Blake books but I have yet to read ONE of the Merry Gentry series though I own them all. I bought them for my mother who enthuses about them regularly. I remain singularly unmoved and tell her I'll get around to it one day but the plot just doesn't appeal to me. The characters interest me but not enough yet to open the book. Not m/m but the first one that came to mind :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. God yes, but it would be professionally inappropriate for me to say. It's the same thing as you, though. Wildly popular books that I read and went, "What, THIS? Really?" Makes me feel better, though, for when that happens with people and my books. Sometimes it just happens.

    ReplyDelete
  3. What Heidi said. Honestly, Jen, I've lost count of the number of ecstatically reviewed books I've dnf'd. Reading a book is an individual experience. Not everyone likes lamb chops and prime rib, either. Even though everyone says they're good, they may not be good for YOU.

    Don't sweat the small stuff. Just read the good stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ok, you should really give the second Ty & Zane book a chance, because I thought the first book was just ok but have liked each of the following books more than its predecessor.

    Not a fan of Taylor and Will myself, so... :)

    Hmm. I know there are definitely books/series that I feel the same way about... but can I remember what they are??? Geoffrey Knight's Fathom's Five series. The Conquest books by SJ Frost.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Cait

    I've managed to avoid getting too hooked on the UF m/f books. I've even slowed down with the JR Ward BDB books and haven't read the last two in the series. I find that readers are often excited for the first 4-5 books and then the excitement dies down a little. Hmmm, maybe that's a post for another day!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Heidi

    It doesn't bother me so much with one off books (although there have been times when I've wondered whether I was the only person who didn't love a particular book) because I know that all reading habits are different and what thrills one person doesn't another. It with the series's that it hits me most, particularly when there's a lot of buzz going around about it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Samantha

    Don't sweat the small stuff. Just read the good stuff.

    Great advice! Although everyone is telling me these series ARE the good stuff :). You're right though, what works for one doesn't work for another. I should just accept that *nods*.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Et tu, Chris? ;)

    Before I can read the next in the Zane/Ty series I will have to re-read the first book now. I'm not sure I'm that fussed about doing that.

    I read the first Fathom's Five book and still have the second on my TBR pile, so it looks like I'm not feeling the love for that series either :).

    Not read the Conquest books.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yeah, the less I say the better.

    ReplyDelete
  10. What, Sean? You don't even want to talk about those DR Who spin off series books I know you like to read?! :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. They're fine. I thought we were talking specifically about m/m. But if we're being broad, I thought "The Help" was a load of claptrap that wanted to assuage white guilt and erase history rather than being a 'charming feelgood story about the civil rights era'.

    ReplyDelete
  12. And it wasn't a series. Disregard this communication.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hmmm, not read or even heard of The Help. Was it very popular?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yep. Bestseller. Just made into a film.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Oh, OK. Sometimes I think I'm lost in my own little m/m romance bubble because I don't often read outside the genre these days.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Umm, no comment. Let's just say you're not alone, Jen ;)

    ReplyDelete
  17. I'm in the confession booth with ya Jen, shove over. I never finished Cut & Run. Ooops. No particular reason, I just lost interest and didn't care about them. And like you, I've loved other books by the authors so it's not a style thing, just ... dunno.

    There are other books in the Dangerous series? Huh. Obviously didn't grab me either I don't think.

    I'm always quick to pipe up that Bareback and the sequel are not my thing while others adore it. Can't think of any others off hand. Maybe the Harry Dresden books. I got bored about half-way through book 1 and never finished it. Same with Anita Blake, I never finished book 1. That seems to be a trend with me. Either you grab me right off or eh.

    It does feel like you are swimming against the tide sometimes when everyone is tweeting and posting about something and you just don't care. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  18. I hear and agree wholeheartedly with the sentiments - to the extent I think sometimes I'm on another planet from most other readers :(.

    I'll confess I get irritated by books that are launched as already set for sequels / offshoots / prequels / matching towels etc. That isn't just in m/m though we seem to have a lot of it. It's great if your characters insist on plenty of page time and have potential for many adventures - it just seems mercenary to me to *start* from that premise. Maybe it's my author-jealousy talking *g*.

    I raved about the PB Ryan series to a friend on holiday in the summer, then she found it just "meh". I'd secretly downloaded it to her Kindle when she was out at the pool, thank god it didn't cost too much *g*.

    BDB - I started late and caught up in a rush, but I think it peaked at Lover Mine. You can only run the same scenario a limited number of times ... can't you???

    Gave up that detective series at F for ...

    Found someone who *doesn't* love Jack Reacher the other day, what's that all about? LOL

    Great post, Jen!

    ReplyDelete
  19. I'm not going to mention any m/m ones - anyway I can't think of any series ones that I feel that way about, though there are individual ones I've found left me cold though everyone raved about them. But outside the m/m world I confess to being left cold by the Sooki Stackhouse books. The first one was okay, then the second one just annoyed me almost from the opening page. The worst thing was, I had the first 8 of them that I'd got for a bargain price! Oops! Luckily, paper not eBooks, so I could donate them to the charity shop. I still haven't dared to confess to the friend who got me to try them in the first place that I'm not reading any more of them, ever.

    ReplyDelete
  20. LOL - I just went along with the assumption that I had slid past grumpy middle-aged woman straight into grumpy old fart.

    And this feeling doesn't stop at books and series, let's toss movies and television shows into the mix as well.

    Like everyone else, I won't mention specifics - but the disconnect became so bad I started looking for items with poor reviews under the theory that well, I didn't care for the ones raved about....

    :)

    Now I have to laugh, because once again, in your subtle Brit way you've tempted me into far more honesty that I usually indulge in. (I'm still getting email on my off-the cuff comment re: enjoying pee play).

    ReplyDelete
  21. Oddly enough, I was just about to make a post about how several books that I scored as 1-2 stars (max) had much higher ranking than a book I gave 4 stars. I just can't understand it. I mean, logically, I know why...but my brain just smacks itself and says "But they are so BAAAAD"

    I can usually find amusement/enjoyment out of books that are popular, whether or not I adore them. But as long as a book is relatively well written, then I just chalk it up to different tastes.

    Poorly written? Then I think people are just _____ _____ idiots.

    ReplyDelete
  22. All I could think as I read this was, Wouldn't it be a galaxy full of fascinating if all authors felt free to speak their minds -- about books, publishers, other authors, readers, reviewers...?

    ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  23. I never could get into the Jarheads series. I read one short story, was vaguely amused and knew I couldn't stand the characters for more than that.

    I don't read many ongoing series. Just Anita Blake. I swore off after Narcissus in Chains (gad, so BAD), but she suckered me in by having Anita actually WORK in the next one.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Blasphemy!! I am deeply disappointed! Just kidding :)
    I haven't visited those GR pages but I do like T&Z.

    Everyone is entitled to her/his own opinion. You can't like all the same books, which is a good thing. Things would be boring. If I see a book on GR that gets 5 stars only I tend to stay away from it. It's more like an aversion against the "follow the herd" feel.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Oooh Ingrid, I have the same "resist the herd" reaction sometimes! I'm very contrary LOL.

    But seriously, I think it's difficult for someone to step outside the flow and say - hang on, I didn't really like this, I don't see what the fuss is about.

    And running alongside that is the effect where people go with the flow *just because* i.e. they find something fabulous because other people do, because they want to agree, because they're swayed by large batches of 5* reviews, sometimes regardless of the book itself LOL. That's exhausting and not very useful, except for the author's ego I suppose, though some of them don't ask for that attention.

    (word verification is "baring", I have to laugh)

    ReplyDelete
  26. It's hard but I will at times.

    Like I am reading Hounded (fantasy) at the moment. It got raving reviews on GR. I bought it because I liked the blurb but I am still reading it after 2 weeks and that is so much not my thing. So I doubt I will buy the next book,

    ReplyDelete
  27. Jo: Well I'm glad it's not just me :).

    Tam: Yay, we can squish up together :).

    That's what I love about you, we share the same tastes in books :). I'm also known for never having finished Bareback and that was even before the infamous cheating scene.

    I'm about 3 books into the Dresden Files and still enjoying them but I only read about 1 every few months so I'm not letting myself get bored with the formula. At this rate I'll never catch up with the series :).

    ReplyDelete
  28. Clare: Um, so I had to Google Jack Reacher! Don't tempt me. I'm already trying to catch up with far too many series books!

    I'll confess I get irritated by books that are launched as already set for sequels / offshoots / prequels / matching towels etc.

    I think it's OK if an author has planned a series - ie they have a definite story arc and a vague idea of how many books they are taking to get there - but I agree that some books often have the potential for sequel fodder, even if it's the lonely best friend of one of the heroes.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Becky: I got a Sookie Stackhouse book out of the library and never finished it. In some ways I can see the appeal, but it didn't really do anything for me.

    That's awkward too isn't it, when you have a RL friend who doesn't connect with a book you raved about. I have a friend who I bought a copy of Cross Stitch (or Outlander to you US peeps - no idea why it has a different name in the UK) whilst telling her it was one of the best romance books I've ever read. She hated it and only made herself finish it so that I wouldn't be upset! Bless her.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Hi Chrissy

    but the disconnect became so bad I started looking for items with poor reviews under the theory that well, I didn't care for the ones raved about....

    That's a good plan. I might try that myself :).

    I'm very sorry to have tempted you to say more than you should. Never mind, you're amongst friends here :).

    ReplyDelete
  31. Hi Alex

    Oddly enough, I was just about to make a post about how several books that I scored as 1-2 stars (max) had much higher ranking than a book I gave 4 stars. I just can't understand it. I mean, logically, I know why...but my brain just smacks itself and says "But they are so BAAAAD"

    That's when you really start doubting yourself, isn't it? I sometimes wonder whether I'm very stupid and have missed something really clever about these books. Often though it's just a matter of taste and what a reader wants. After all if all a reader wants in their romance/erotica books is sex followed by instantlove then obviously they will rate a book like that more highly than me when I prefer a higher plot to sex ratio and don't like insta-love.

    Not that there's anything wrong with wanting to read a book that's all sex. It's just doesn't happen to be my thing :).

    ReplyDelete
  32. Hi KZ

    Wouldn't it be a galaxy full of fascinating if all authors felt free to speak their minds -- about books, publishers, other authors, readers, reviewers...?

    ooh yes! There'll also be many more instances of 'Handbags at Dawn' too :)

    ReplyDelete
  33. Hi Angelia

    I read one Jarheads book over the space of about 3-6 months. It was the third book where SM introduces the ménage relationship. Every time I was in the mood for some hot m/m/m smexin I picked up the book and read a few pages. It actually worked really well reading it like that :). I even considered buying the next in the series to do the same but haven't got around to it.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Hi Ingrid

    If I see a book on GR that gets 5 stars only I tend to stay away from it. It's more like an aversion against the "follow the herd" feel.

    Yes, I know what you mean. Either that or I wonder whether the author has a lot of friends which is a little cynical, I know.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Hi Clare (again :))

    And running alongside that is the effect where people go with the flow *just because* i.e. they find something fabulous because other people do, because they want to agree, because they're swayed by large batches of 5* reviews, sometimes regardless of the book itself LOL.

    I think this is a natural feeling for people to want to fit in and we see it in all walks of life, not just books. Pressure to conform is difficult to counteract and I suppose that is why I feel a little odd if I don't like books or series or characters that everyone else is raving about.

    After all why else would young men wander round showing their underwear if not for pressure to conform within their age-group and to thumb their noses at us older generation.

    OK, I'm definitely a grumpy middle-aged woman now!

    ReplyDelete

Don't be shy now...tell me what you really think.